I really like what this post is trying to do. The idea is a valuable one. But this explanation could use some work—not just because inferential distances are large, but because the presentation itself is too abstract to clearly communicate the intended point. In particular, I’d strongly recommend walking through at least 2-3 concrete examples of bottlenecks in ideas.
I really like what this post is trying to do. The idea is a valuable one. But this explanation could use some work—not just because inferential distances are large, but because the presentation itself is too abstract to clearly communicate the intended point. In particular, I’d strongly recommend walking through at least 2-3 concrete examples of bottlenecks in ideas.
I replied at https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Z66PxZnZJNSXzf8TL/bottleneck-examples