I don’t think “applause light” is being used correctly here. Leo’s claim is not devoid of content, it’s just a claim that most people agree with.
Thanks, maybe I should’ve just said “preaching to the choir” though there’s a more specific and gnarly cognitive move I’m getting at than just directional motivated bias from agreeing with the speaker’s conclusion.
agree, though it does have words people emotionally react to:
█ ████ ████ ██████ ████ █████ ████ safety research epistemics ██ labs ███ █████████ distorted, ███ ████ ████ ██ █ downside █████ ███████████ ████ ████████ █████ ███ ███ safety research ██ ███ ███ █████ ████ ██ epistemics ██ ████████ ██ ████ ██ safety ██ █ lab
I don’t think “applause light” is being used correctly here. Leo’s claim is not devoid of content, it’s just a claim that most people agree with.
Thanks, maybe I should’ve just said “preaching to the choir” though there’s a more specific and gnarly cognitive move I’m getting at than just directional motivated bias from agreeing with the speaker’s conclusion.
agree, though it does have words people emotionally react to:
█ ████ ████ ██████ ████ █████ ████ safety research epistemics ██ labs ███ █████████ distorted, ███ ████ ████ ██ █ downside █████ ███████████ ████ ████████ █████ ███ ███ safety research ██ ███ ███ █████ ████ ██ epistemics ██ ████████ ██ ████ ██ safety ██ █ lab