I’m with Oliver Sourbut. Unless you’ve solved the induction problem AND can formally define your reference class, everything is analogy and degrees of similarity.
Which doesn’t make your take wrong, just that it’s a question of how close the analogy is, and how the analogous evidence applies to the compared predictions.
I’m with Oliver Sourbut. Unless you’ve solved the induction problem AND can formally define your reference class, everything is analogy and degrees of similarity.
Which doesn’t make your take wrong, just that it’s a question of how close the analogy is, and how the analogous evidence applies to the compared predictions.