It’s also my understanding that Anthropic has historically been relatively leak-free, until a certain memo leaked a few weeks ago during the DoW incident. Supposedly twice is still coincidence, not enemy action, but it does feel like a questionable coincidence and I wonder if the same person is responsible for both leaks.
I agree that it’s suspicious as hell. This one also happened while Dario Amodei was outside the US, doing a deal with the Australian government.
Actually, these are two separate leaks located very closely to each other (so counting the DoW memo leak this makes it three leaks).
There has been a leak of about 3000 unpublished reports internal assets including the info about “Mythos” model testing, and this new separate leak of Claude Code source.
So something does seem to be wrong (might be just too much strain on people, but could be “enemy action” as well).
I agree that it’s suspicious as hell. This one also happened while Dario Amodei was outside the US, doing a deal with the Australian government.
Actually, these are two separate leaks located very closely to each other (so counting the DoW memo leak this makes it three leaks).
There has been a leak of about 3000 unpublished reports internal assets including the info about “Mythos” model testing, and this new separate leak of Claude Code source.
So something does seem to be wrong (might be just too much strain on people, but could be “enemy action” as well).
This seems important, do you have a source for this news?
I think the canonical source has been https://fortune.com/2026/03/26/anthropic-says-testing-mythos-powerful-new-ai-model-after-data-leak-reveals-its-existence-step-change-in-capabilities/
But if one types
anthropic mythos
into Google, one sees plenty.
Ah, hmm, I was aware of these articles, I had hoped there was a bit more to it that I had missed. Thanks for your help.