This problem of “I want to teach you how to do something by yourself—to start with, do what I say because I say so” seems to apply to teaching children / non-rational people to be more rational, teaching unhappy / non-biologically-broken depressed people (i.e. broken world view, not causatively abnormal brain chemistry) to be happier, as well as dependent people to be more independent.
Taking better control of yourself, starting by giving more control to someone else to get you past the initial obstable that you can’t get past and onto the proverbial ladder that you can then continue cimbing yourself.
It looks like a more legitimate problem than your dismissal gives it credit for.
Okay, I’ll choose my own way.
What else does Auditore say I should do?
This problem of “I want to teach you how to do something by yourself—to start with, do what I say because I say so” seems to apply to teaching children / non-rational people to be more rational, teaching unhappy / non-biologically-broken depressed people (i.e. broken world view, not causatively abnormal brain chemistry) to be happier, as well as dependent people to be more independent.
Taking better control of yourself, starting by giving more control to someone else to get you past the initial obstable that you can’t get past and onto the proverbial ladder that you can then continue cimbing yourself.
It looks like a more legitimate problem than your dismissal gives it credit for.
Why do you care? You should not follow it anyways. ;)