Standing will take more calories. Supposing you eat more to compensate (so you always have plenty of glucose available to the brain), does standing, sitting, or a mix of the two, allow for the most computer work given great motivation and interest over a very long period (say, 12 hours)?
My prior says that eventually standing will become distractingly tiring, and the “caveman brain” excitement (if any) will fade. So all sitting sounds like it gives a better chance of producing over a long period, than all standing. But I haven’t tried it.
Standing will take more calories. Supposing you eat more to compensate (so you always have plenty of glucose available to the brain), does standing, sitting, or a mix of the two, allow for the most computer work given great motivation and interest over a very long period (say, 12 hours)?
My prior says that eventually standing will become distractingly tiring, and the “caveman brain” excitement (if any) will fade. So all sitting sounds like it gives a better chance of producing over a long period, than all standing. But I haven’t tried it.