“Take a tile known to both of you (if there is doubt, take one your oponent knows).”
I don’t understand the parenthetical comment: it seems to be saying “If you are not sure both of you know what a tile is, then choose a tile your opponent knows.” How could you know your opponent knows what a tile is but not be sure you know? Or maybe I’m just not understanding?
Fun fact—better strategy for memory: You play memory 1 vs. 1, and it’s your move.
If you know a pair, take it (this much is obvious).
Chose an unknown tile at random.
If you know the match take it (also clear).
Take a tile known to both of you (if there is doubt, take one your oponent knows).
People don’t do step 4 right usually.
“Take a tile known to both of you (if there is doubt, take one your oponent knows).”
I don’t understand the parenthetical comment: it seems to be saying “If you are not sure both of you know what a tile is, then choose a tile your opponent knows.” How could you know your opponent knows what a tile is but not be sure you know? Or maybe I’m just not understanding?
I am not tracking why step 4 is good. Can you explain it in more detail?
If you flip over a tile that matches some other tile that has already been revealed, your opponent gets to make the match first.
Oh. Apparently I have been playing memory wrong all these years? I thought the peeks were private. Or maybe I am just misremembering.
Or just a different version of the game. Seeing the peeks makes it feel more competitive.