I understand and verified to the best of my ability the information contained in the post. If a LW moderator want to take action, I welcome their correction.
EDIT: I checked and the post contains about a 1000 words. At a 1 minute per 50 words this would be about 20 min. I have probably spent at least 3 hours on drafting this post, plus additional edits and engagement.
Quite frankly, the concerns raised here seem to be more originating from a ludditist denial and an intuitive dismissal of AI stylistic choices rather than genuine issues with the content—A stubborn attachment to the weakness of the flesh if you will. This post has generated quite a lot of content-level engagement so seemingly the style is only an issue for a loud minority.
I understand and verified to the best of my ability the information contained in the post. If a LW moderator want to take action, I welcome their correction.
EDIT: I checked and the post contains about a 1000 words. At a 1 minute per 50 words this would be about 20 min. I have probably spent at least 3 hours on drafting this post, plus additional edits and engagement.
Quite frankly, the concerns raised here seem to be more originating from a ludditist denial and an intuitive dismissal of AI stylistic choices rather than genuine issues with the content—A stubborn attachment to the weakness of the flesh if you will. This post has generated quite a lot of content-level engagement so seemingly the style is only an issue for a loud minority.