Heuristically I would lean towards the “executive overreach” interpretation if the court order offers sound arguments which the executive refuses to engage with on the same level.
If it ignores a court order outright, then it’s clear that the traditional balance of power has been upset in favour of the executive.
How do you determine whether instances of this are executive overreach or judicial overreach?
Heuristically I would lean towards the “executive overreach” interpretation if the court order offers sound arguments which the executive refuses to engage with on the same level.
If it ignores a court order outright, then it’s clear that the traditional balance of power has been upset in favour of the executive.