Interestingly, physics in the 20 century moved in the direction of more and more observer-centered perspective: first, special and general relativity, then quantum mechanics and later anthropic principle.
Yes, and the observer-centered perspective is accompanied by the rejection of the notion of “absolute reality”. Like relativity to absolute spacetime. In my opinion, the interpretive challenges of QM are nothing different. “Observer” is simply anything’s perspective one wishes to conduct the physical analysis from.
My original motivation for this topic was trying to solve anthropic paradoxes, which are surprisingly closely connected to quantum interpretations and the metaphysics of science and consciousness.
Interestingly, physics in the 20 century moved in the direction of more and more observer-centered perspective: first, special and general relativity, then quantum mechanics and later anthropic principle.
Yes, and the observer-centered perspective is accompanied by the rejection of the notion of “absolute reality”. Like relativity to absolute spacetime. In my opinion, the interpretive challenges of QM are nothing different. “Observer” is simply anything’s perspective one wishes to conduct the physical analysis from.
My original motivation for this topic was trying to solve anthropic paradoxes, which are surprisingly closely connected to quantum interpretations and the metaphysics of science and consciousness.