Agreed, though with the caveat that losing some money in the stock market is an important early step in gaining experience—presumably it’s the same with coordination problems. But that sort of practice should be undertaken with the understanding that it’s likely to fail on an object-level, and you want that learning experience to be cheap—e.g. don’t make it harder for the next person to solve the coordination problem.
In particular, I wouldn’t want to discourage people from building coordination skills by having a minimum level of status required to even try. Rather, we ideally want ways to experiment that aren’t too damaging if they fail. (And, of course, we want to have realistic expectations about chance of success—ideally people go into a learning experience fully aware that it’s a learning experience, and don’t bet their house on day-trading.)
Agreed, though with the caveat that losing some money in the stock market is an important early step in gaining experience—presumably it’s the same with coordination problems. But that sort of practice should be undertaken with the understanding that it’s likely to fail on an object-level, and you want that learning experience to be cheap—e.g. don’t make it harder for the next person to solve the coordination problem.
In particular, I wouldn’t want to discourage people from building coordination skills by having a minimum level of status required to even try. Rather, we ideally want ways to experiment that aren’t too damaging if they fail. (And, of course, we want to have realistic expectations about chance of success—ideally people go into a learning experience fully aware that it’s a learning experience, and don’t bet their house on day-trading.)