I think it might be good to update the title of the post with a [Edit: Updated] tag or something.
Might also be useful for the disclaimer you added to the top to include a more complete explanation of your current take on the situation (although maybe a bit more work, and depends on your what your actual current take is).
AFAICT, Ben’s comment was a decent synthesis of the point you were originally intending to make and gwern’s counterpoint. While I don’t think the point as originally worded was correct, it was still pointing at a fact that I don’t think most people really have fully integrated into their model, and that seemed like something important enough that just saying ‘refuted’ didn’t quite seem right either.
I think it might be good to update the title of the post with a [Edit: Updated] tag or something.
Might also be useful for the disclaimer you added to the top to include a more complete explanation of your current take on the situation (although maybe a bit more work, and depends on your what your actual current take is).
AFAICT, Ben’s comment was a decent synthesis of the point you were originally intending to make and gwern’s counterpoint. While I don’t think the point as originally worded was correct, it was still pointing at a fact that I don’t think most people really have fully integrated into their model, and that seemed like something important enough that just saying ‘refuted’ didn’t quite seem right either.