One kind of thing, that’s still up to be written is about human movement. In Sensual Bachata there’s a movement called the body wave. If you look at it from the outside it does look like the chest goes up diagonally to the front/upwards. However, the correct technique for it is to go linearly front + linearly upwards and not diagonal. In addition to that being what’s taught by the teachers who coined Bachata sensual, I also have vague somatic senses of why move the chest diagonal is wrong. There seems to be an anyone part where the aspect about linearly upwards for the body wave just does not compute for many teachers and who then teach inferior versions.
However, I’m not able to explain it in a way that’s convincing to a Bachata teacher that teaches it the wrong way. For the book I’m writing about fascia and human movement I however need to explain why the principle of why that’s the case and ideally explain it in a way that references relevant science and a gears model that people can reason with.
There’s genuine thought involved even if I already sort of know the answer because I don’t yet know it in a way that’s easily picked up by other people.
One kind of thing, that’s still up to be written is about human movement. In Sensual Bachata there’s a movement called the body wave. If you look at it from the outside it does look like the chest goes up diagonally to the front/upwards. However, the correct technique for it is to go linearly front + linearly upwards and not diagonal. In addition to that being what’s taught by the teachers who coined Bachata sensual, I also have vague somatic senses of why move the chest diagonal is wrong. There seems to be an anyone part where the aspect about linearly upwards for the body wave just does not compute for many teachers and who then teach inferior versions.
However, I’m not able to explain it in a way that’s convincing to a Bachata teacher that teaches it the wrong way. For the book I’m writing about fascia and human movement I however need to explain why the principle of why that’s the case and ideally explain it in a way that references relevant science and a gears model that people can reason with.
There’s genuine thought involved even if I already sort of know the answer because I don’t yet know it in a way that’s easily picked up by other people.