I don’t see why people liked this post so much. I don’t see even what is the thought of the post. (Which though may be problem on my side, not on post’s side, and still.)
Besides, there is already a comment in hpmor itself on this topic:
She was one hundred percent on the side of Harry Potter that it was time for Hogwarts to give up on those gibbering slowpokes and just change the rules, starting here and now. But not by eliminating the Snitch, that was going all the way back to eleventh century Kwidditch. It didn’t matter if Headmistress Hufflepuff had first introduced the innovation because one of her students had wanted to play the game but not been suited to the usual roles. Snitches had caught on internationally because it was more exciting when the game could always end in the next minute.
And also Harry doesn’t seem to behave in character for him:
This argument, unfortunately, had considerably more than two factions. Some darned busybodies were proposing sensible-sounding alternatives to eliminating the Snitch entirely, and this was threatening to split the vote and sap the momentum for reform.
In retrospect, Harry thought, it would have been nice to have Draco unfurl his own banner from the Slytherin side saying ‘SNITCHES ARE AWESOME’, to set the polarity of the debate.
(And also if such potion existed, intelligence explosion would happen long before even Quirrell.)
I don’t see why people liked this post so much. I don’t see even what is the thought of the post. (Which though may be problem on my side, not on post’s side, and still.)
Besides, there is already a comment in hpmor itself on this topic:
And also Harry doesn’t seem to behave in character for him:
(And also if such potion existed, intelligence explosion would happen long before even Quirrell.)