I think more technicallly-oriented history would benefit a lot of students. And more stories generally—not just facts, but world models of how individuals who were gifted in some ways and damaged in others navigated their society in order to produce lasting value.
But really, one size doesn’t fit all, and never has. Some students will bounce off some or all aspects of adulthood and competence, no matter how it’s presented. Some will be great, happy people regardless of classes. The really good teachers/professors and a well-fitting curriculum for a lot in the middle will be pivotal for them.
I think more technicallly-oriented history would benefit a lot of students. And more stories generally—not just facts, but world models of how individuals who were gifted in some ways and damaged in others navigated their society in order to produce lasting value.
But really, one size doesn’t fit all, and never has. Some students will bounce off some or all aspects of adulthood and competence, no matter how it’s presented. Some will be great, happy people regardless of classes. The really good teachers/professors and a well-fitting curriculum for a lot in the middle will be pivotal for them.