The extreme version of this would be a journal that only contains one, very popular, paper.
Sounds weird, but what is the harm actually? We assume that the paper is good. How could the journal abuse the situation? If they start publishing bad papers afterwards, they will ruin the average.
I guess it’s annoying to have several such journals at the top of rankings lists. Similarly to how if you look up a list of premier league footballers with the highest goals per game, the list will normally be restricted to players who’ve played a certain number of games.
The extreme version of this would be a journal that only contains one, very popular, paper.
Sounds weird, but what is the harm actually? We assume that the paper is good. How could the journal abuse the situation? If they start publishing bad papers afterwards, they will ruin the average.
I guess it’s annoying to have several such journals at the top of rankings lists. Similarly to how if you look up a list of premier league footballers with the highest goals per game, the list will normally be restricted to players who’ve played a certain number of games.