Man, I didn’t even follow the rest of that discussion until now.
I’m going through and systematically upvoting you to bring your accurate, on-point posts back up towards 0. Like, in the thread where we were disagreeing, you were telling me the conventional approach, which is an important thing to know. And now I know where this charge without charge idea is coming from, which is nice! But half of it was at −1. And it’s worse with the higher-rated, less comprehensible objections.
Man, I didn’t even follow the rest of that discussion until now.
I’m going through and systematically upvoting you to bring your accurate, on-point posts back up towards 0. Like, in the thread where we were disagreeing, you were telling me the conventional approach, which is an important thing to know. And now I know where this charge without charge idea is coming from, which is nice! But half of it was at −1. And it’s worse with the higher-rated, less comprehensible objections.
Thank you for voicing this :)