One note is that you did the math about the costs based on PE10 (which gave an extra 11% chance of success) but calculated the benefits based on PE20 (which gave an extra 53% chance of success).
Yes, you’re right, thanks. Is it fixed now?
I initially wrote that part based on the chart in the original post, but later found it has a discrepancy with the paper, and that the paper is right. So I went and fixed the text and but missed that one.
It looks correct now, thanks!
One note is that you did the math about the costs based on PE10 (which gave an extra 11% chance of success) but calculated the benefits based on PE20 (which gave an extra 53% chance of success).
Yes, you’re right, thanks. Is it fixed now?
I initially wrote that part based on the chart in the original post, but later found it has a discrepancy with the paper, and that the paper is right. So I went and fixed the text and but missed that one.
It looks correct now, thanks!