I’ll attempt to explain the lines that are confusing you.
The anecdote was a self-deprecating parody of my tendency to wander off into personal anecdotes while posting. I was trying to contrast it with Said Achmiz’s focus on the object level problem, which is much more suited to less wrong.
I am referring to his responses to me on DSL.
Point is, while these things all sting, and I remember them, they are of equal importance.
I’ll attempt to explain the lines that are confusing you.
The anecdote was a self-deprecating parody of my tendency to wander off into personal anecdotes while posting. I was trying to contrast it with Said Achmiz’s focus on the object level problem, which is much more suited to less wrong.
I am referring to his responses to me on DSL.
Point is, while these things all sting, and I remember them, they are of equal importance.
This is self-explanatory.