Are there, though? We have no idea how to think about stability NOR optimality on scales that include “end of time” or “certainty of physics”. My intuition (not enough evidence to call it a belief) is that all equilibria are dynamic and unstable. Separately, I suspect “optimum” is undefined for a lot of the interactions we talk about—there really is no bridge between is and ought.
In local scopes there are. I guess to the extent it’s coherent the bare minimum obligation just becomes “don’t let the end of time become a local scope”?
Are there, though? We have no idea how to think about stability NOR optimality on scales that include “end of time” or “certainty of physics”. My intuition (not enough evidence to call it a belief) is that all equilibria are dynamic and unstable. Separately, I suspect “optimum” is undefined for a lot of the interactions we talk about—there really is no bridge between is and ought.
In local scopes there are. I guess to the extent it’s coherent the bare minimum obligation just becomes “don’t let the end of time become a local scope”?