The LW staff (those who hold the authority to implement major changes!) needs to commit a considerable amount of time for the optimization of LW. If necessary, hire someone and make his main job LW optimization.
Money and time do not grow on trees. All of the LW staff have full-time jobs already; hiring a full-time developer would involve either firing a current employee of FHI/CFAR/MIRI or not hiring an additional employee.
The people contributing to optimization threads need to get serious feedback from the staff. It is just frustrating to feel that those who are in charge of implementing changes will not even take the time to think my arguments through.
There is no one person in charge of implementing changes. In general, feature requests are added to this, and then somebody may or may not write the code. Some of the undone feature requests date back to 2009.
The full issue list and code is available online, if you want to try to optimize your proposal for optimizing optimizing LessWrong.
Money and time do not grow on trees. All of the LW staff have full-time jobs already; hiring a full-time developer would involve either firing a current employee of FHI/CFAR/MIRI or not hiring an additional employee.
There is no one person in charge of implementing changes. In general, feature requests are added to this, and then somebody may or may not write the code. Some of the undone feature requests date back to 2009.
The full issue list and code is available online, if you want to try to optimize your proposal for optimizing optimizing LessWrong.