We could try paranoid debating, as jimmy suggested to me during an IM conversation. One thing to note is that it would be good if rules and suggestions for the game were actually spelled out in the wiki in more detail… the article there is sort of a stub, and could use advice on optimal group size, how long a game runs, a scoring rule, and so on.
We could try paranoid debating, as jimmy suggested to me during an IM conversation. One thing to note is that it would be good if rules and suggestions for the game were actually spelled out in the wiki in more detail… the article there is sort of a stub, and could use advice on optimal group size, how long a game runs, a scoring rule, and so on.