The point that’s relevant for us is the infrastructure Ponzi scheme: how cities usually can’t presently afford to maintain the infrastructure they build, instead relying on future growth to pay for it.
Ive seeen is pushback against that. Apparently the claim as not that suburbs aren’t supporting, but things look different when you include business districts.
Ive seeen is pushback against that. Apparently the claim as not that suburbs aren’t supporting, but things look different when you include business districts.
Interesting, any references?