This definition is circular, because MET hours is a function of hours exercised * exertion level. A decent level of physical fitness will burn 10 MET per hour of very intense exercise.
Is this a backwards? I’d expect higher numbers for activity to be associated with greater VO2 max in the regression formula, and in the spreadsheet you’ve given the label indicates a 0 for low activity and 2 for highest activity, so one of these should be corrected.
Is this a backwards? I’d expect higher numbers for activity to be associated with greater VO2 max in the regression formula, and in the spreadsheet you’ve given the label indicates a 0 for low activity and 2 for highest activity, so one of these should be corrected.
Thank you, I’m going to investigate this.