This definition is circular, because MET hours is a function of hours exercised * exertion level. A decent level of physical fitness will burn 10 MET per hour of very intense exercise.
Is this backwards? I’d expect higher numbers for activity to be associated with greater VO2 max in the regression formula, and in the spreadsheet you’ve given the label indicates a 0 for low activity and 2 for highest activity, so one of these should be corrected.
Is this backwards? I’d expect higher numbers for activity to be associated with greater VO2 max in the regression formula, and in the spreadsheet you’ve given the label indicates a 0 for low activity and 2 for highest activity, so one of these should be corrected.
Thank you, I’m going to investigate this.