The fact that you engage with the article and share it, might suggest to the author that he did everything right.
True, but this is one of the less bad articles that have Terminator references (as it makes a bit more sense in this specific context) so I mind less that I am sharing it. It’s mostly significant insofar as being one I saw today that prompted me to make a template email.
The idea that your email will discourage the author from writing similar articles might be mistaken.
I can see it having no influence on some journalist, but again
I am not sure how big the impact will be, but after the email is already drafted sending it to new people is pretty low effort and there’s the potential that some journalists will think twice..
..
Secondly, calling autonomous weapons killer robots isn’t far of the mark.
It’s still fairly misleading, although a lot less than in AGI discussions.
The policy question of whether or not to allow autonomous weapons is distinct from AGI.
I can see it having no influence on some journalist, but again
My point wasn’t that it creates no impact but that you show the journalist by emailing him that his article is engaging. This could encourage him to write more articles like this.
True, but this is one of the less bad articles that have Terminator references (as it makes a bit more sense in this specific context) so I mind less that I am sharing it. It’s mostly significant insofar as being one I saw today that prompted me to make a template email.
I can see it having no influence on some journalist, but again
..
It’s still fairly misleading, although a lot less than in AGI discussions.
I am not explicitly talking about AGI either.
My point wasn’t that it creates no impact but that you show the journalist by emailing him that his article is engaging. This could encourage him to write more articles like this.