I’m not sure I really grokked the Level 1 Thesis of the book. (Or maybe I’m not sure I grokked how the level 2 Thesis was different?). Was the point more than they were different theses, or more that the particular examples and bugbears that inspired the thesis were different than the naive reading would have you believe?
I’m not sure I really grokked the Level 1 Thesis of the book. (Or maybe I’m not sure I grokked how the level 2 Thesis was different?). Was the point more than they were different theses, or more that the particular examples and bugbears that inspired the thesis were different than the naive reading would have you believe?