The admin claimed that the evidence in favor of WMD presence was much stronger than it actually was. This was partially because they were confused/​groupthinky, and partially because they were aiming to persuade. I agree that it was reasonable to think Iraq had WMDs on priors.
My understanding is:
The admin claimed that the evidence in favor of WMD presence was much stronger than it actually was. This was partially because they were confused/​groupthinky, and partially because they were aiming to persuade. I agree that it was reasonable to think Iraq had WMDs on priors.