In a way, I would have liked Luhmann for Rationalists better, but few people know Niklas Luhmann these days. I think that few people have analyzed how differences lead to systems better and more comprehensively than him. He is difficult to read because he had to invent a lot of differences while at the same time explaining in the language of social science. In a way he approaches the grounding problem from the social side.
In a way, I would have liked Luhmann for Rationalists better, but few people know Niklas Luhmann these days. I think that few people have analyzed how differences lead to systems better and more comprehensively than him. He is difficult to read because he had to invent a lot of differences while at the same time explaining in the language of social science. In a way he approaches the grounding problem from the social side.
I think this is maybe a good starting point: System as Difference