Severe or willful violation of our RSP, or misleading the public about it.
I’m guessing you don’t consider the v3 updates to be willful violation of the RSP, but, I don’t really know why.
I can tell a story that’s like “well it is still following a process of changing the RSP that was laid on in advance”. But I’d pretty surprised if you thought “go through the motions of changing it advance” is loadbearing for whether Anthropic is good, if the RSP was predictably going to get changed when it became too costly.
But, if you don’t consider the v3 updates a spiritual violation I don’t really know what could count as a violation that is more specific than “you think overall Anthropic is net bad for the world”, at which point, I don’t know what work “the RSP” would be doing in your personal accounting.
I know it’s hard to articulate exact details for things like this, and I know you’re tired[1] of these convos, but, I would appreciate some kind of example of what would actually count as a willful RSP violation in your book, that is particularly different from “the leadership not being trustworthy or having bad judgment.”
I’m sympathetic about people complaining a bunch without understanding, e.g. how board governance works, or generally acting under a simple tribalistic model that doesn’t engage with any details, and often yelling at you in a way that’s really unpleasant that you’ve done a good job off dealing with. But from my end, Anthropic leadership just straightforwardly has already demonstrated bad integrity in the relevant areas based on the publicly available information. And your previous explanations haven’t actually addressed that and I’m not net-sympathetic about you being tired of that part.
I’m guessing you don’t consider the v3 updates to be willful violation of the RSP, but, I don’t really know why.
I can tell a story that’s like “well it is still following a process of changing the RSP that was laid on in advance”. But I’d pretty surprised if you thought “go through the motions of changing it advance” is loadbearing for whether Anthropic is good, if the RSP was predictably going to get changed when it became too costly.
But, if you don’t consider the v3 updates a spiritual violation I don’t really know what could count as a violation that is more specific than “you think overall Anthropic is net bad for the world”, at which point, I don’t know what work “the RSP” would be doing in your personal accounting.
I know it’s hard to articulate exact details for things like this, and I know you’re tired[1] of these convos, but, I would appreciate some kind of example of what would actually count as a willful RSP violation in your book, that is particularly different from “the leadership not being trustworthy or having bad judgment.”
I’m sympathetic about people complaining a bunch without understanding, e.g. how board governance works, or generally acting under a simple tribalistic model that doesn’t engage with any details, and often yelling at you in a way that’s really unpleasant that you’ve done a good job off dealing with. But from my end, Anthropic leadership just straightforwardly has already demonstrated bad integrity in the relevant areas based on the publicly available information. And your previous explanations haven’t actually addressed that and I’m not net-sympathetic about you being tired of that part.