I’m wondering where Biological Naturalism[1] falls within these two camps? It seems like sort of a “third way” in between them, and incidentally, is the explanation that I personally have found most compelling.
My take based on the summary is that it’s squarely in Camp #2.
In particular, I think this part seals the deal
This means that while consciousness and other mental phenomena are rooted in the physical workings of the brain, they also have their own first-person ontology that is not captured by third-person descriptions of the brain’s workings.
According to Camp #1, there’s nothing ontologically special about consciousness, so as soon as you give it its own ontology, you’ve decided which camp you’re in.
My take based on the summary is that it’s squarely in Camp #2.
In particular, I think this part seals the deal
According to Camp #1, there’s nothing ontologically special about consciousness, so as soon as you give it its own ontology, you’ve decided which camp you’re in.