This is built on that assumption, of course. An assumption I do not hold at all. But that does not matter, what do are logical implications and correlations, and I am curious about that only.
In that case, I think there is no reason to believe that God’s idea of “good” is the same as ours. (Especially if our ideas of “good” depend on culture.) But not the same doesn’t necessarily imply opposite or orthogonal. It could be e.g. that God shares a part of our concept of goodness, but not all of it.
It might help to know if the “creator of universe” is particularly interested in Earth and specifically humans, or not. If yes, that would increase the probability that there is a relation between God’s values and human values.
This is all built on the assumption that some kind of god exists. If you don’t buy that premise, the entire debate is nonsensical.
This is built on that assumption, of course. An assumption I do not hold at all. But that does not matter, what do are logical implications and correlations, and I am curious about that only.
In that case, I think there is no reason to believe that God’s idea of “good” is the same as ours. (Especially if our ideas of “good” depend on culture.) But not the same doesn’t necessarily imply opposite or orthogonal. It could be e.g. that God shares a part of our concept of goodness, but not all of it.
It might help to know if the “creator of universe” is particularly interested in Earth and specifically humans, or not. If yes, that would increase the probability that there is a relation between God’s values and human values.