Don’t think i follow this. My last comment was about the ultimate limits to (nano)robot doubling times, after lots of time to experiment/iterate, not imagining AI designing this stuff a priori.
The post assumes abundant AI cognitive labour on the level of top humans but nothing stronger.
Yeah, I think Thomas was arguing the opposite direction, and he argued that you “underrate the capabilities of superintelligence,” and I was responding to why that wasn’t addressing the same scenario as your original post.
Don’t think i follow this. My last comment was about the ultimate limits to (nano)robot doubling times, after lots of time to experiment/iterate, not imagining AI designing this stuff a priori.
The post assumes abundant AI cognitive labour on the level of top humans but nothing stronger.
Yeah, I think Thomas was arguing the opposite direction, and he argued that you “underrate the capabilities of superintelligence,” and I was responding to why that wasn’t addressing the same scenario as your original post.