Even when China currently doesn’t fill reports, a public position of “hey, we think there should be a treaty that does include reports and an UN agency to verify that no undisclosed research is happening” is possible in response to the Chinese.
It’s what Biden should say in response on the public stage.
OK, that’s a possible response to the Chinese, but it doesn’t change their position of demanding more transparency to be more coherent, given their lack of transparency around COVID and other issues compared to the transparency of the US and Ukraine. So I think Zvi was correct calling it nonsensical.
And to go back to the first point, if you had done the research, it’s very clear that Ukraine does have the “defensive nonweapon” pathogens in labs in Lviv, and similar pathogens in other BSL-3 labs, and they have said so publicly.
Even when China currently doesn’t fill reports, a public position of “hey, we think there should be a treaty that does include reports and an UN agency to verify that no undisclosed research is happening” is possible in response to the Chinese.
It’s what Biden should say in response on the public stage.
OK, that’s a possible response to the Chinese, but it doesn’t change their position of demanding more transparency to be more coherent, given their lack of transparency around COVID and other issues compared to the transparency of the US and Ukraine. So I think Zvi was correct calling it nonsensical.
And to go back to the first point, if you had done the research, it’s very clear that Ukraine does have the “defensive nonweapon” pathogens in labs in Lviv, and similar pathogens in other BSL-3 labs, and they have said so publicly.