“This article proposes a new AI model in which conversations — especially those involving AI-generated opinions, empathy, or subjective responses — are made public. AI should not exist in private, hyper-personalized interactions that subtly shape individual beliefs; instead, it should function within open discourse, where its influence is visible, scrutinized, and ultimately shaped by human discourse.
Unlike open-source AI models like DeepSeek, which face corporate resistance due to competition and proprietary concerns, this approach does not require AI models themselves to be open-source. Instead, it focuses on making AI-generated conversations publicly visible, ensuring that AI’s influence is collectively understood and debated rather than privately internalized.
While only a handful of engineers can interpret AI code, everyone can interpret AI-generated conversations. Making these interactions publicly accessible enhances collective intelligence, ensuring that AI’s role in shaping thought remains transparent, amendable, and subject to human oversight — rather than a hidden, individualized experience controlled by select elites.”
Keeping AI Subordinate to Human Thought: A Proposal for Public AI Conversations
Link post
“This article proposes a new AI model in which conversations — especially those involving AI-generated opinions, empathy, or subjective responses — are made public. AI should not exist in private, hyper-personalized interactions that subtly shape individual beliefs; instead, it should function within open discourse, where its influence is visible, scrutinized, and ultimately shaped by human discourse.
Unlike open-source AI models like DeepSeek, which face corporate resistance due to competition and proprietary concerns, this approach does not require AI models themselves to be open-source. Instead, it focuses on making AI-generated conversations publicly visible, ensuring that AI’s influence is collectively understood and debated rather than privately internalized.
While only a handful of engineers can interpret AI code, everyone can interpret AI-generated conversations. Making these interactions publicly accessible enhances collective intelligence, ensuring that AI’s role in shaping thought remains transparent, amendable, and subject to human oversight — rather than a hidden, individualized experience controlled by select elites.”