In the sense that you would choose 1A over 1B if those were the only options in a one-shot decision. The money-pump arguments might constrain your patterns of choices over some sequences. But this tells you nothing about what you should choose in other contexts.
I’d also recommend Carlsmith’s discussion of similar problems with money-pump arguments here. (I have other problems with such arguments, but they’re tricky to unpack here.)
In the sense that you would choose 1A over 1B if those were the only options in a one-shot decision. The money-pump arguments might constrain your patterns of choices over some sequences. But this tells you nothing about what you should choose in other contexts.
I’d also recommend Carlsmith’s discussion of similar problems with money-pump arguments here. (I have other problems with such arguments, but they’re tricky to unpack here.)
I haven’t thought more about it yet; but I’ll say already that yes, I did miss that obvious point here, sorry, and thanks for pointing it out.