Thanks, that was actually what EY said in his quote, which I put just below my model—that we should change the bit each time. I somehow missed it (“send back a ‘0’ if a ‘1’ is recorded as having been received, or vice versa—unless some goal state is achieved”).
As I stated in the epistemic status, this article is just a preliminary write-up. I hope more knowledgeable people will write much better models of x-risks from time machines and will be able to point out where avturchin was wrong and explain what the real situation is.
Thanks, that was actually what EY said in his quote, which I put just below my model—that we should change the bit each time. I somehow missed it (“send back a ‘0’ if a ‘1’ is recorded as having been received, or vice versa—unless some goal state is achieved”).
As I stated in the epistemic status, this article is just a preliminary write-up. I hope more knowledgeable people will write much better models of x-risks from time machines and will be able to point out where avturchin was wrong and explain what the real situation is.