There is a debate about where the information and knowledge for biological forms and structures, like the skull of a frog, comes from. The DNA does not seem to contain enough information to fully specify complex structures.
Some propose that there are fields of form or patterns that biological systems tap into to develop their structures. But we do not yet know where these fields or patterns exist.
Being able to control and manipulate biological forms through techniques like CRISPR does not necessarily mean we fully understand the underlying mechanisms that generate those forms.
Analogies like music and vibrations can help explain how biological forms may arise from interactions across scales, from molecules to cells to tissues. But they are limited.
There are likely eternal forms or patterns that biological systems evolve to match, like mathematical truths. But we do not yet have a complete understanding of where these forms reside.
True understanding of biological forms may require going beyond mechanistic explanations to philosophical questions about what we are actually dealing with.
The ability to control something is not the same as truly understanding it at a deeper level.
Different observers with different frequencies may “see” different aspects of a system or form.
Science and metaphysics need to work together to make progress in understanding complex phenomena like biological forms.
An ideal solution would allow generating any desired biological form, indicating a true grasp of how forms are encoded. But we may never achieve this level of control.
There is a debate about where the information and knowledge for biological forms and structures, like the skull of a frog, comes from. The DNA does not seem to contain enough information to fully specify complex structures.
Some propose that there are fields of form or patterns that biological systems tap into to develop their structures. But we do not yet know where these fields or patterns exist.
Being able to control and manipulate biological forms through techniques like CRISPR does not necessarily mean we fully understand the underlying mechanisms that generate those forms.
Analogies like music and vibrations can help explain how biological forms may arise from interactions across scales, from molecules to cells to tissues. But they are limited.
There are likely eternal forms or patterns that biological systems evolve to match, like mathematical truths. But we do not yet have a complete understanding of where these forms reside.
True understanding of biological forms may require going beyond mechanistic explanations to philosophical questions about what we are actually dealing with.
The ability to control something is not the same as truly understanding it at a deeper level.
Different observers with different frequencies may “see” different aspects of a system or form.
Science and metaphysics need to work together to make progress in understanding complex phenomena like biological forms.
An ideal solution would allow generating any desired biological form, indicating a true grasp of how forms are encoded. But we may never achieve this level of control.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWgzWYt5c88
I love how much levin manages to sound like a crackpot, I wonder how much he’ll turn out to really be one