You seem to be treating this as some kind of personal injury which you are entitled to demand the immediate cessation of, whereas Zack’s perspective could be summarized as “Lèse-majesté doesn’t violate the NAP”. The Metz transcripts describe at greath length why Zack does not respect the community’s majesté, so you may have better luck persuading him if you adopt a perspective in which people are not entitled to a good reputation.
You seem to be treating this as some kind of personal injury which you are entitled to demand the immediate cessation of, whereas Zack’s perspective could be summarized as “Lèse-majesté doesn’t violate the NAP”. The Metz transcripts describe at greath length why Zack does not respect the community’s majesté, so you may have better luck persuading him if you adopt a perspective in which people are not entitled to a good reputation.