ut sometimes there’s not an obvious morally right or wrong answer when the interests of multiple parties are at stake.
But “I don’t care much about the interests of the other party” is not a necessary part of comparing those interests.
If you don’t care much about the interests of the other party, the outcome of comparing their interests to yours will, of course, be that you always win.
You seem to be treating this as some kind of personal injury which you are entitled to demand the immediate cessation of, whereas Zack’s perspective could be summarized as “Lèse-majesté doesn’t violate the NAP”. The Metz transcripts describe at greath length why Zack does not respect the community’s majesté, so you may have better luck persuading him if you adopt a perspective in which people are not entitled to a good reputation.
But “I don’t care much about the interests of the other party” is not a necessary part of comparing those interests.
If you don’t care much about the interests of the other party, the outcome of comparing their interests to yours will, of course, be that you always win.
You seem to be treating this as some kind of personal injury which you are entitled to demand the immediate cessation of, whereas Zack’s perspective could be summarized as “Lèse-majesté doesn’t violate the NAP”. The Metz transcripts describe at greath length why Zack does not respect the community’s majesté, so you may have better luck persuading him if you adopt a perspective in which people are not entitled to a good reputation.