Reading out “google logo ligature” in a font reader seems more informative than skipping the logo entirely, which is what an unprintable unicode character would do.
I agree. I was not precise in my statement—what I wanted to say was that if for some reason they are trying to use it in place of picture, as a decoration (which I can’t really see why), then this would be the approach. Still, I think using ligature for the word Google is the right approach.
Reading out “google logo ligature” in a font reader seems more informative than skipping the logo entirely, which is what an unprintable unicode character would do.
I agree. I was not precise in my statement—what I wanted to say was that if for some reason they are trying to use it in place of picture, as a decoration (which I can’t really see why), then this would be the approach. Still, I think using ligature for the word Google is the right approach.