I believe Harris’s view is that we are still justified in imprisoning people for consequentialist reasons, just not based on a “moral desert” theory.
I know, but that has problems of its own: there isn’t much practical difference between imprisonment-for -consequentialist- reasons and imprisonment-for-moralistic reasons, so there’s not much basis for a crusade.
I believe Harris’s view is that we are still justified in imprisoning people for consequentialist reasons, just not based on a “moral desert” theory.
I know, but that has problems of its own: there isn’t much practical difference between imprisonment-for -consequentialist- reasons and imprisonment-for-moralistic reasons, so there’s not much basis for a crusade.