We’re also bad OOD and many of our supposed advantages over them boil down to our distribution differences (embodiment and first-person-first data). I agree we’re much better OOD than them but not so much that I think there’s no comparison. As usual I’m skipping over my ideas for ways to improve them.
We’re also bad OOD and many of our supposed advantages over them boil down to our distribution differences (embodiment and first-person-first data).
Kind of and yeah?
I agree we’re much better OOD than them but not so much that I think there’s no comparison.
I wouldn’t say “there’s no comparison”[1], but I do think it looks like a “qualitative” difference. What exactly it is would require a more involved explication of the concept, which might be infohazardous.
We’re also bad OOD and many of our supposed advantages over them boil down to our distribution differences (embodiment and first-person-first data). I agree we’re much better OOD than them but not so much that I think there’s no comparison. As usual I’m skipping over my ideas for ways to improve them.
Kind of and yeah?
I wouldn’t say “there’s no comparison”[1], but I do think it looks like a “qualitative” difference. What exactly it is would require a more involved explication of the concept, which might be infohazardous.
Not really my way of speaking about this sort of stuff / I’m not sure what you mean by this.