It’s not accepted by the majority of the scientific establishment, so it’s not “science”. However, it’s claims don’t violate known physical law.
Whether something is a science has nothing to do with whether it violates physical law for which a consensus exists within the scientific community.
Paranormal is a much better word to describe those claims.
When Feynman made up the term cargo-cult science one of is prime examples was rat psychology research. Those researchers where doing experiment but the didn’t do them in a way that really tested the claims they were investigating.
Pseudoscience is when you claim that there scientific evidence for a claim when there isn’t. You aren’t a pseudoscientist for investigating a hypothesis.
Whether something is a science has nothing to do with whether it violates physical law for which a consensus exists within the scientific community.
Paranormal is a much better word to describe those claims.
When Feynman made up the term cargo-cult science one of is prime examples was rat psychology research. Those researchers where doing experiment but the didn’t do them in a way that really tested the claims they were investigating.
Pseudoscience is when you claim that there scientific evidence for a claim when there isn’t. You aren’t a pseudoscientist for investigating a hypothesis.