I’m going to start keeping track of opaque or subtle outsiders who aren’t very formal but who might have a piece of the ultimate alignment puzzle. At the very least, these are posts which an alignment theorist (whether AI or human) ought to be able to say something about, e.g. if there is a fallacy or omission, they should be able to identify it.
I’m going to start keeping track of opaque or subtle outsiders who aren’t very formal but who might have a piece of the ultimate alignment puzzle. At the very least, these are posts which an alignment theorist (whether AI or human) ought to be able to say something about, e.g. if there is a fallacy or omission, they should be able to identify it.
Along with this post, I’ll mention
the series by @False Name
post by @Snowyiu
example of @Q Home
Thank you, Mitchell. I appreciate your interest, and I’d like to clarify and expand on the ideas from my post, so I wrote part 2 you can read above