That’s a pretty ironic sentence, given that the link doesn’t go to the APA’s new Guidelines for Psychological Practice With Boys and Menbut to an article about them. Before charging other people with science denialism it would be helpful to understand what a guideline happens to be.
Come on, man. I link to the source that I think would be most relevant for my readers to understand the following discussion. In this case, it’s the official APA release on the APA website describing the APA guidelines, it’s not like I was linking to some third party account. As for the PDF with the guidelines themselves, I link to it at least twice in my post and it is linked from the release as well.
That’s a pretty ironic sentence, given that the link doesn’t go to the APA’s new Guidelines for Psychological Practice With Boys and Menbut to an article about them. Before charging other people with science denialism it would be helpful to understand what a guideline happens to be.
Come on, man. I link to the source that I think would be most relevant for my readers to understand the following discussion. In this case, it’s the official APA release on the APA website describing the APA guidelines, it’s not like I was linking to some third party account. As for the PDF with the guidelines themselves, I link to it at least twice in my post and it is linked from the release as well.