There’s a huge difference between grantic that a process has significant positive clinical effects and recommending the process.
To the extend that the first is true, I don’t think it makes sense to argue that chiropractic is bad pseudoscience.
To recommend it you have to compare it’s advantges and disadvantages to other forms of treatment and I don’t claim that it regularly wins out when you do that.
There’s a huge difference between grantic that a process has significant positive clinical effects and recommending the process.
To the extend that the first is true, I don’t think it makes sense to argue that chiropractic is bad pseudoscience. To recommend it you have to compare it’s advantges and disadvantages to other forms of treatment and I don’t claim that it regularly wins out when you do that.