Choosing people who lived more than 70 years ago is a bad choice for the argument that you want to make.
People in the past being wrong is no good reason for taking people who believe in religion today seriously.
This means that the article is pretty low quality and has no place on LW.
In addition to being low quality it’s a violation of copyright and as such should be deleted.
How is it a violation of copyright if I claim no ownership, cite the source and don´t allow it to be spread in my or any other´s name? I am just curious. If you are right I will delete it. Might be good for my karma too, since the majority seems to be against this for unknown reason SINCE I DON`T ARGUE FOR A DEITY.
How is it a violation of copyright if I claim no ownership, cite the source and don´t allow it to be spread in my or any other´s name?
You are 19 and live in a country that doesn’t even have a concept of fair use that the US law has.
Copyright doesn’t work the way you think it does. Citing sources and not claiming ownership is not enough to make something fair use. You can’t simply takes the text of another person and use it.
since the majority seems to be against this for unknown reason SINCE I DON`T ARGUE FOR A DEITY.
You don’t get voted down on LW because you argue for a deity. That’s no reason to vote you down. Trying to make an appeal to the authority of famous dead scientists on the other hand is.
Choosing people who lived more than 70 years ago is a bad choice for the argument that you want to make. People in the past being wrong is no good reason for taking people who believe in religion today seriously.
This means that the article is pretty low quality and has no place on LW.
In addition to being low quality it’s a violation of copyright and as such should be deleted.
How is it a violation of copyright if I claim no ownership, cite the source and don´t allow it to be spread in my or any other´s name? I am just curious. If you are right I will delete it. Might be good for my karma too, since the majority seems to be against this for unknown reason SINCE I DON`T ARGUE FOR A DEITY.
You are 19 and live in a country that doesn’t even have a concept of fair use that the US law has.
Copyright doesn’t work the way you think it does. Citing sources and not claiming ownership is not enough to make something fair use. You can’t simply takes the text of another person and use it.
You don’t get voted down on LW because you argue for a deity. That’s no reason to vote you down. Trying to make an appeal to the authority of famous dead scientists on the other hand is.