I don’t think I should clarify further right now, though I could potentially be convinced otherwise. I’d need to think about precisely what I want to highlight. It’s not like it’ll be that long before it becomes glaringly obvious, but I don’t currently see a reason why clarifying this particular aspect makes us safer.
I don’t think I should clarify further right now, though I could potentially be convinced otherwise. I’d need to think about precisely what I want to highlight. It’s not like it’ll be that long before it becomes glaringly obvious, but I don’t currently see a reason why clarifying this particular aspect makes us safer.
Thats fair however, I would say that the manner of foom determines a lot about what to look out for and where to put safeguards.
If it’s total($) thats obvious how to look out.
flop/$ also seems like something that eg. NVIDIA is tracking closely, and per OP probably can’t foom too rapidly absent nanotech.
So the argument is something about the (D*I)/flop dynamics.
[redacted] I wrote more here but probably its best left unsaid for now. I think we are on a similar enough page.