I may reply to this more fully, but first I’d like you to acknowledge that you cannot in fact point to a false prediction by EY here, and in the exact post you seemed to be referring to, he says that his view is compatible with this sort of AI producing realistic sculptures of human faces!
Now you, finally presented with a tiny molecular smiley—or perhaps a very realistic tiny sculpture of a human face—know at once that this is not what you want to count as a smile.
The thing producing the very realistic tiny sculpture of a human face is a superintelligence, not some initial human designed ML system that is used to create the AI’s utility function.
What post? All I quoted recently was “Complex Value Systems are Required to Realize Valuable Futures”, which does not appear to contain the word ‘sculpture’.
I may reply to this more fully, but first I’d like you to acknowledge that you cannot in fact point to a false prediction by EY here, and in the exact post you seemed to be referring to, he says that his view is compatible with this sort of AI producing realistic sculptures of human faces!
as someone who often agrees with jake, cmon jake, own up to it, EY has said reasonable things before and you were wrong :P
edit: oops meant to reply to @jacob_cannell
Wrong about what? Of course EY has said many reasonable and insightful things
Oh do you mean this text you quoted?
The thing producing the very realistic tiny sculpture of a human face is a superintelligence, not some initial human designed ML system that is used to create the AI’s utility function.
What post? All I quoted recently was “Complex Value Systems are Required to Realize Valuable Futures”, which does not appear to contain the word ‘sculpture’.