I’m not sure we even need intent. It might ve sufficient to treat AI as dangerous machines. Harm caused by AI takes maybe different form than large physical machines like cars or industrial plants and eg dams because it is more virtual or thru linguistic channels, butvwe could still treat it the same. You are still responsible for the consequences, esp. if you have been negligent in operating or maintaining the machine. And mandatory insurance was introduced for the remaining base level risk of harm.
I’m not sure we even need intent. It might ve sufficient to treat AI as dangerous machines. Harm caused by AI takes maybe different form than large physical machines like cars or industrial plants and eg dams because it is more virtual or thru linguistic channels, butvwe could still treat it the same. You are still responsible for the consequences, esp. if you have been negligent in operating or maintaining the machine. And mandatory insurance was introduced for the remaining base level risk of harm.
Related AI Frontiers article: Don’t Let AI Developers Hire Their Own Referees